← overview
User Groups
Christof Schadt
I have created a couple of user groups and wanted to discuss if they are reasonable
Group | Scope | Description |
---|---|---|
admin | Admin definition according to the Wiki | also allows admin section |
chair | Any chair or co-chair of the TC or PC | |
evaluation | The evaluation group for this Wiki | |
judge | An member of the testing committee | Allows the testing committee to have a “judge only” area |
tc | Any user part of the planning committee | This way, the TC could have their own section, not public to e.g. Connectathon participants |
user | Any user that is newly registered | the “basic” account |
vendor | Any user affiliated to a vendor | Allows “vendor” discussion rooms during a Connectathon |
<vendorname> | Any user related to a specific vendor | Allows vendor-related discussions during Connectathon |
Any comments?
Discussion
Looks good! But I assume having both “vendor” and <vendorname> is a typo?
No, actually not. “vendor” would be all the users from vendors. ”<vendorname>” would allow for e.g. a group “brainlab” or “raysearch”. This way access to certain areas could be restricted to specific vendors only. Don't know if this is required. But it would be possible :)